St Maximos the Confessor
On
Deification
The introduction on St. Maximus and the quotes are from Volume II of the PHILOKALIA as translated and edited by G.E.H. Palmer, Philip Sherrard, and Kallistos Ware and published by Faber and Faber.
The extreme importance of St
Maximos the Confessor (580-662) for the Orthodox spiritual tradition is indicated by the
fact that no other writer is assigned so much space in the Philokalia. A member of the
aristocracy, after receiving an elaborate education St. Maximos served at first in the
civil service, perhaps as secretary to the Emperor Heraklios. Around 614 he became a monk
at the monastery of Philippikos in Chrysopolis (Scutari), close to Constantinople,
subsequently moving to another monastery not far distant at Cyzikos (Erdek). In 626, at
the time of the Persian invasion, he fled to Crete and eventually to Africa, where he
remained for some years. From 633-4 onwards he played a leading part in opposing the
heresies of Monoenergism and Monotheletism, and because of this he was arrested in 653 by
the imperial authorities, brought to Constantinople for trial, and sent into exile.
Further trials and condemnations followed, the last being at Constantinople in 662, after
which he was flogged, his tongue was plucked out and right hand cut off. He died soon
afterwards as an exile in the Caucasus. His memorial is observed in the Orthodox Church on
21 January, and also on the day of his death, 13 August.
In his numerous writings St. Maximos discusses
almost all aspects of Christian truth, including the interpretation of Scripture, the
doctrine of the incarnation, ascetic practice, and the Divine Liturgy. He insists upon the
close link between dogma and prayer. When he opposed Monotheletism, this was not
because of some technicality, but because such a view subverted the understanding of the
full reality of man's salvation and deification in Christ. The Monotheletes wished to
reconcile the supporters of the Council of Chalcedon (451), who ascribed two natures to
the incarnate Christ, with the Monophysites, who believed that He has only one nature; and
so they proposed as a compromise the theory that Christ has two natures, the one divine
and the other human, but only a single will. Against this St. Maximos maintained that
human nature without a human will is an unreal abstraction: if Christ does not have a
human will as well as a divine will, He is not truly man; and if He is not truly man, the
Christian message of salvation is rendered void. What we see in Christ our Saviour is
precisely a human will, genuinely free yet held in unwavering obedience to His divine will;
and it is by virtue of this voluntary co-operation of manhood with divinity in Christ,
which restored the integrity of human nature, that we are enabled to make our own will
freely obedient to the will of God and so attain salvation. St. Maximos' teaching was
confirmed after his death by the Sixth Ecumenical Council, meeting at Constantinople in
680-1.
"God made us so that we might become 'partakers of the divine nature' (2 Pet. 1:4) and sharers in His eternity, and so that we might come to be like Him (cf. 1 John 3:2) through deification by grace. It is through deification that all things are reconstituted and achieve their permanence; and it is for its sake that what is not is brought into being and given existence." p. 173
"A sure warrant for looking forward with hope to deification of human nature is provided by the incarnation of God, which makes man god to the same degree as God Himself became man. For it is clear that He who became man without sin (cf. Heb. 4:15) will divinize human nature without changing it into the divine nature, and will raise it up for His own sake to the same degree as He lowered Himself for man's sake. This is what St. Paul teaches mystically when he says, ' that in the ages to come He might display the overflowing richness of His grace' (Eph. 2:7). p. 178
"Deification, briefly, is the encompassing and fulfilment of all times and ages, and of all that exists in either. This encompassing and fulfilment is the union, in the person granted salvation, of his real authentic origin with his real authentic consummation. This union presupposes a transcending of all that by nature is essentially limited by an origin and a consummation. Such transcendence is effected by the almighty and more than powerful energy of God, acting in a direct and infinite manner in the person found worthy of this transcendence. The action of this divine energy bestows a more than ineffable pleasure and joy on him in whom the unutterable and unfathomable union with the divine is accomplished. This, in the nature of things, cannot be perceived, conceived or expressed." p. 240
"The Lord gave clear evidence of His supreme power in what He endured from hostile forces when He endowed human nature with an incorruptible form of generation. For through His passion He conferred dispassion, through suffering repose, and through death eternal life. By His privations in the flesh He re-established and renewed the human state, and by His own incarnation He bestowed on human nature the supranatural grace of deification." p. 246
"Since the devil is jealous both of us and of God, he persuaded man by guile that God jealous of him (cf. Gen. 3:5), and so made him break the commandment. The devil is jealous of God lest His power should be seen actually divinizing man: and he is jealous of man lest through the attainment of virtue man should become a personal participant in divine glory."
"To reconcile us with the Father, at His Father's wish the Son deliberately gave Himself to death on our behalf so that, just as He consented to be dishonoured for our sake by assuming our passions, to an equal degree He might glorify us with the beauty of His own divinity." p. 248
"And as in His providence He became man, so He deified us by grace, in this way teaching us not only to cleave to one another naturally and to love others spiritually as ourselves, but also, like God, to be more concerned for others than for ourselves " p.263
"Everyone who does not apply himself to the spiritual contemplation of Holy Scripture has, Judaic-wise, also rejected both the natural and the written law; and he is ignorant of the law of grace which confers deification on those who are obedient to it. He who understands the written law in a literal manner does not nourish his soul with the virtues. He who does not grasp the inner principles of created beings fails to feast his intellect on the manifold wisdom of God. And he who is ignorant of the great mystery of the new grace does not rejoice in the hope of future deification. Thus failure to contemplate the written law spiritually results in a dearth (lack, an indequate supply) of the divine wisdom to be apprehended in the natural law; and this in its turn is followed by a complete ignorance of the deification given by grace according to the new mystery." p. 267
"A crown of goodness (cf. Ps. 65:11) is a pure faith, adorned with eloquent doctrine, and with spiritual principles and intellections, as if with precious stones, and set as it were on the head of the devout intellect. Or rather, a crown of goodness is the Logos of God Himself, who encircles the intellect as if it were a head, protecting it with manifold forms of providence and judgement - that is, with mastery of the passions that lie within our control and with patient endurance of those we suffer against our will; and who makes this same intellect more beautiful by enabling it to participate in the grace of deification." p.271
St. Theodoros the Great Ascetic
"One must first deny oneself and then, taking up the cross, must follow the Master toward the supreme state of deification." p. 38
"To come to another point: everything may be understood in terms of its purpose. It is this that determines the division of everything into its purpose. It is this that determines the division of everything into its constituent parts, as well as the mutual relationship of those parts. Now the purpose of our life is blessedness or, what is the same thing, the kingdom of heaven or of God. This is not only to behold the Trinity, supreme in Kingship, but also to receive an influx of the divine and, as it were, to suffer deification; for by this influx what is lacking and imperfect in us is supplied and perfected. And the provision by such divine influx of what is needed is the food of spiritual beings. There is a kind of eternal circle, which ends where it begins. For the greater our noetic perception, the more we long to perceive; and the greater our longing, the greater our enjoyment; and the greater our enjoyment, the more our perception is deepened, and so the motionless movement, or the motionless immobility, begins again. Such then is our purpose, in so far as we can understand it." p. 43